Page 1 of 1
Replacement for the ULA in a 16K Ram Pack
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2024 6:51 am
by acsi
Would anyone have the wiring diagram and parts list to replace the 1H035E ULA in the Sinclair 16K Ram Pack issue 3?
Re: Replacement for the ULA in a 16K Ram Pack
Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2024 9:26 pm
by David G
acsi wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 6:51 am
Would anyone have the wiring diagram and parts list to replace the 1H035E ULA in the Sinclair 16K Ram Pack issue 3?
Issue 3 wiring diagram
parts list is:
An alternative to the ULA is to use several ICs. Which is what Issue 1 and Issue 2 did:
The downside was: to fit inside the pack it used an entirely separate board:

Re: Replacement for the ULA in a 16K Ram Pack
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2024 12:52 am
by 1024MAK
In another topic on here, a member worked out that the ULA does not in fact fully replicate the whole counter and multiplexer circuitry shown in the issue 1 and 2 boards. Instead it only provides a subset, the Z80 providing the remaining address bits for refresh. In the issue 1 and 2 design, the counter is providing a guaranteed refresh address for the DRAM chips.
Another point is that most third party RAM packs completely dispensed with a refresh address counter. It having been found that it was not necessary. They just have a single logic chip for address decoding and DRAM control lines, two multiplexer chips for the 14 bit to 7 bit switching, and of course the eight DRAM chips. This part of the reason that they could undercut Sinclair with a lower price.
Mark
Re: Replacement for the ULA in a 16K Ram Pack
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 12:44 am
by DoktorDoris
i was delighted to find those old magazines online by clicking on the schematics. i love old magazines, i often spend hours reading everyday electronics magazines from the 70s and 80s online.
Re: Replacement for the ULA in a 16K Ram Pack
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:58 am
by David G
Yes, I get "sidetracked" when researching some ZX81 technology or software, and end up examining a totally different article from the magazine ...
