First time poster here, hoping someone can help unlock a puzzle.
I recently sold, in all good faith, a 16k ZX Spectrum that I have had from new. The serial number on the case is 001-167624, in green lettering. Having received the unit, the buyer contacted me to state that I was trying to “con” them as the serial number on the main board is different, being for a second issue Spectrum, and that I had clearly lied in my listing when stating that I had the item from new. This despite having sent the unit in the original external packaging which clearly showed my name, the name of the Sinclair fulfilment centre and the dates and times of the attempted deliveries by the postal service. Rather than engage in a protracted row , I have simply refunded the money and expect the return of the unit.
My question then is how might this discrepancy have been arrived at? As this was nigh on 40 years ago and family, careers and house moves have intervened my memory is a little hazy but I am certain I had at least one failed unit that I returned to Sinclair. Is it possible they simply swapped out the failed first issue 16k main board leaving a second issue 16k board in a first issue case? By the way, my ex buyer says the Zx Spectrums rarely failed and that had Sinclair swapped the board, they would have put in a 48k board as default, neither of which are my recollections of practice at the time.I have searched this forum, and from at least one of the threads it looks as if that the repair and return practice at the time might make this possible.
Anyhow, I hope someone may be able to help here. It hurts to be called a liar.
